Lucknow’s RWAs: Who Watches the Regulators?
For thousands of apartment residents in Lucknow, the Resident Welfare Association (RWA) is the closest thing to a local government. It regulates parking, maintenance, security, common facilities and, increasingly, the movement and conduct of tenants and visitors. But what happens when residents question the authority of those running these associations? In December 2025, the Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies & Chits, Lucknow Division, cancelled the registration of Celebrity Green F & G Resident Welfare Association after finding that its formation was legally untenable. Residents had challenged its constitution, pointing to the absence of the mandatory Completion Certificate. The order also dealt with allegations concerning unauthorised maintenance collections, prepaid electricity charges, parking and common-area management, and the RWA functioning without a lawful handover from the promoter. The case raises an obvious question: if an association’s registration is subsequently cancelled, what happens to the money it collected while it was functioning, and under what authority were those charges imposed? In July 2026, the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, hearing a dispute involving Sarvodaya Sulabh Apartments in Gomti Nagar Extension, observed that existing laws do not provide an effective mechanism for resolving disputes between apartment owners and RWAs. The court asked the Uttar Pradesh government to examine the possibility of a dedicated grievance-redressal mechanism. The dispute included allegations that the RWA had closed six of the society’s ten entry gates, imposed parking charges, clamped vehicles and charged ₹500 a day from defaulters, besides using a private crane to tow vehicles. Questions were also raised regarding the RWA’s constitution. In 2025 in another Lucknow apartment complex a police case was filed alleging by two tenants that they were assaulted after a parking dispute involving RWA members. The incident illustrates how disputes over parking and society rules can escalate, particularly when tenants have limited representation in decisions affecting them. Against this backdrop, the Indie Times Investigative Team examined four apartment societies, comparing their registered bye-laws with rules actually enforced on residents. The investigation focused on penalties, parking restrictions, tenant permissions, visitor access and use of common facilities. The central question was simple: were these rules authorised by the registered bye-laws, or created through informal committee decisions? The investigation also examined the money residents pay. Do RWAs maintain audited annual accounts? Are maintenance collections reconciled? Who approves vendor contracts? Are penalties properly accounted for? Can residents inspect the accounts they fund? A further area of concern is Interest Free Maintenance Security (IFMS). Under the UP RERA framework notified in July 2026, developers are required to maintain IFMS separately and transfer the corpus, along with records, to the association at project handover. For residents, therefore, the issue is bigger than a parking dispute or a maintenance bill. It is whether associations exercising substantial day-to-day authority can demonstrate the legal basis for their rules and account transparently for the money collected from the people they govern.
Read more
